Title: Opera and
Opera Singers
Author: Stauffer, Donald Barlow
Print source: J.R. LeMaster and Donald D. Kummings,
eds.,
"Walt Whitman: An Encyclopedia"
(New York: Garland Publishing, 1998), reproduced by
permission.
Italian opera and opera singers were an important
influence on Whitman's creative development during those
crucial years in the early 1850s when Leaves of Grass
was germinating. Probably no other single influence is
more important than this one. When we consider how many
poems Whitman calls songs or chants, and how many
references he makes to the voice and to singing, we come
to realize that music and singing were central to the
creation of his poetry. "But for the opera," he
declared, "I could never have written Leaves of Grass "
(qtd. in Trowbridge 166).
Even a quick glance at Whitman's poems will show the
extent to which he thought of them in musical terms:
from "Song of Myself" and the numerous other songs, to
"Chants Democratic" and hundreds of references to the
voice, singing, carols, hymns, choruses, musical
instruments and the like. Operatic singing in
particular, with its emotions, its atmosphere of close
rapport between singer and audience, and its varied
styles—particularly recitative and aria—is the ground
upon which Whitman built many of his poems. It is
possible to conceive of many of the long passages in
"Song of Myself" and other poems as recitative in the
Italian opera style: not only the catalogs, which
rhythmically enumerate his experiences and perceptions,
but the narrative or dramatic passages as well.
Interspersed throughout these recitative passages are
lyrical sections, such as the apostrophe to "voluptuous
cool-breath'd earth" in section 21, that approximate
operatic arias. Such analogies with recitative and aria
are made explicit in"Out of the Cradle Endlessly
Rocking," where the mockingbird sings its aria of loss,
and in "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd," in
which the hermit thrush sings its carol of death.
Whitman was particularly responsive to musical
influences during the late 1840s and early 1850s, when
Leaves of Grass was in its gestation stage and he was
regularly attending the performances of Italian opera
singers and companies in New York. The moods awakened in
him by music played and sung in the streets, in the
theater and in private shaped many of the poems he
wrote. His own voice, "orotund sweeping and final," was
a response to the almost mystical ecstasy he experienced
when listening to grand opera and the singing of his
favorite tenors and sopranos. In his manuscript
notebooks he wrote of "the chanted Hymn whose tremendous
sentiment shall uncage in my breast a thousand
wide-winged strengths and unknown ardors and terrible
ecstasies" (Uncollected 2:85)—a passage he reworked and
included at the end of section 26 of "Song of Myself,"
beginning, "I hear the chorus, it is a grand opera, / Ah
this indeed is music—this suits me."
Whitman was first exposed to opera in the 1840s, when
the operas of Gaetano Donizetti and Giuseppe Verdi were
performed in the Park Theater by companies featuring
some of the great Italian singers of the day: Cesare
Badiali, Marietta Alboni, Allesandro Bettini and others.
Although he had earlier denounced the opera in 1845 as
foreign and decadent, he quickly became a passionate
convert, around the time when Don Francisco Marti's
Italian opera company arrived from Havana in 1847 for a
month-long season at the Castle Garden.
He began hearing opera regularly at the Astor Place
Opera House from the time it opened in 1847; he also
attended productions at the Park and Broadway theaters
and others, and after 1854 at the beautiful new Academy
of Music. It was during these years that he came to love
the lyrical belcanto style of the operas of Giacchino
Rossini, Vincenzo Bellini, Donizetti and the early Verdi
and became a devoted opera lover. The belcanto style has
its origins in the operas of Rossini, but was used by
other Italian opera composers, including Donizetti, the
early Verdi, and most notably Bellini, whose operas
present a challenge to the singer's vocal technique. Bel
canto consists of long passages of simple melody
alternating with outbursts of elaborate vocal
scrollwork, which turns the voice into a complex wind
instrument. The desired effect was to heighten the
dramatic meaning and significance of the words through
attention to pitch, dynamics, melody, and timing. This
highly emotional and intense use of the human voice was
in Whitman's view the highest form of art.
In a piece in Specimen Days Whitman recalls his
opera-going experiences in the early 1850s: "I heard,
these years, well render'd, all the Italian and other
operas in vogue, 'Somnambula,' 'The Puritans' [both by
Bellini], 'Der Freischutz' [Carl Maria von Weber],
'Huguenots' [Giacomo Meyerbeer], 'Fille d'Regiment'
[Donizetti], 'Faust' [Charles Gounod], 'Etoile du Nord'
[Meyerbeer], 'Poliuto' [Donizetti], and others. Verdi's
'Ernani,' 'Rigoletto,' and 'Trovatore,' with Donizetti's
'Lucia' or 'Favorita' or 'Lucrezia,' and Auber's
'Massaniello,' or Rossini's 'William Tell' and 'Gazza
Ladra,' were among my special enjoyments" (Prose Works
1:20).
Whitman was an enthusiastic fan of the great Italian
singers who came to New York. His favorite tenor was
Allesandro Bettini, who had a deep and lasting effect on
him. The voice of Bettini, who performed the title role
of Ernani and sang in Donizetti's La Favorita in August
1851, moved Whitman to tears; "the singing of this man,"
he wrote, "has breathing blood within it; the living
soul, of which the lower stage they call art, is but the
shell and sham" (Uncollected 1:257). Bettini is almost
certainly the tenor whom Whitman describes in section 26
of "Song of Myself." Another of his favorites was the
great Cesare Badiali, in Whitman's opinion the
"superbest of all superb baritones" in the world: "a
big, coarse, broad-chested, feller, invested, however,
with absolute ease of demeanor—a master of his
art—confident, powerful, self-sufficient" (Traubel 173).
Others include the soprano Angiolina Bosio, who later
became the toast of Europe; Giulia Grisi and her husband
Giuseppe Mario, who Whitman said was "inimitable" in
Lucrezia Borgia. A poem written in Whitman's later years
commemorates the death and funeral of another tenor,
Pasquale Brignoli, whom he had heard years earlier in
many roles in the 1840s and 1850s. The poem, "The Dead
Tenor" (1884), acknowledges the strong influence of the
singing voice on his own "chants."
But his favorite singer by far was the contralto Madame
Marietta Alboni, one of the greatest singers of the
nineteenth century, who created a sensation in her only
New York season in 1852-1853. In the fall she appeared
at Niblo's Garden in twelve operas, and gave eleven more
performances at other houses in the winter and spring.
In addition she gave twelve operatic recitals and was a
soloist in Rossini's Stabat Mater. One music critic
wrote, "Alboni's performances are as purely and
absolutely beautiful as it is possible for anything
earthly to be" (qtd. in Faner 29). Whitman was obviously
in agreement, since he recalled in Specimen Days that he
"heard Alboni every time she sang in New York and
vicinity" (Prose Works 1:20). His poem "To a Certain
Cantatrice" (1860) is addressed to Madame Alboni, who he
says is as deserving of his tribute as heroes, generals,
and other "confronter[s] of despots." She is also
prominently featured in the poem most richly
commemorating his operatic enthusiasms, "Proud Music of
the Storm" (1869): "The teeming lady comes, / The
lustrous orb, Venus contralto, the blooming mother, /
Sister of loftiest gods, Alboni's self I hear" (section
3). Alboni's most profound influence is on the aria of
the mockingbird in "Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking"
and the carol of the hermit thrush in "When Lilacs Last
in the Dooryard Bloom'd," both of which are
distillations of Whitman's experiences in listening to
her singing.
These two poems, in fact, employ a recitative-aria
structure quite consciously modeled on Italian operatic
style. In "Out of the Cradle" the bird songs are printed
in italics in order to emphasize the lyrical quality of
the aria, while the recitative parts underline the
dramatic content and structure of the poem, which, like
Italian opera, tells a tragic story of love, separation,
and death. "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd"
contains more recitative than aria, and does not so
clearly distinguish between them. The arias are not
italicized, but they have an effect similar to those in
"Out of the Cradle." In construction, however, the poem
is closer in form to the sonata or symphony than to
opera.
The poem in which Whitman mentions opera most
extensively is "Proud Music of the Storm" (1869), a kind
of musical autobiography, in which he lists the variety
of musical influences on his life and poetry. If he
resisted the influence of European culture in many ways,
he clearly did not when it came to music; he devotes
over a third of the poem to the operas of Rossini,
Meyerbeer, Donizetti, Verdi, Gounod and Mozart, singling
out "Italia's peerless compositions" and the roles of
Norma, Lucia and Ernani. "Proud Music" also celebrates
Rossini's Stabat Mater (in which he had heard Alboni
perform), and the symphonies and oratorios of Beethoven,
Handel and Haydn, including The Creation.
His preference was clearly for the passionate Italian
style of singing. He had little interest in what the
critic Richard Grant White called "the thin, throaty,
French way of singing" (qtd. in Faner 63), nor did he
share the widespread popular enthusiasm for the dazzling
recitals of the Swedish singer Jenny Lind, a creature of
P.T. Barnum who became a great celebrity during her
1851-1852 New York season. After hearing her perform
Whitman commented on the singing of this "strangely
overpraised woman," writing that she "never touched my
heart in the least," and that "there was a vacuum in the
head of the performance . . . It was the beauty of Adam
before God breathed into his nostrils" (Uncollected
1:257).
Another important influence upon Whitman's developing
taste for operatic music was George Sand's novel
Consuelo (1843), a story of the career of a great singer
that he described to many of his friends as a
masterpiece. In highly rhetorical and florid passages
describing the almost unearthly quality of the heroine's
voice, the novel's English translation gave Whitman a
language for describing the effect on his readers he
desired his poems to create. The reaction of Consuelo's
lover to her singing, for example, is described in
language that could be Whitman's own describing his
poetry: "Music expresses all that the mind dreams and
foresees of mystery and grandeur. It is the
manifestation of a higher order of ideas and sentiments
than any to which human speech can give expression. It
is the revelation of the infinite; and when you sing, I
only belong to humanity in so far as humanity has drunk
in what is divine and eternal in the bosom of the
Creator" (qtd. in Faner 47). The novel had much to do
with forming his taste for great singing and the
experience of listening to it, as well as inspiring in
him a mystical response to the glories of the human
voice.
In addition to his poems about opera and opera singers
Whitman wrote a number of reviews and essays about them.
In 1846-1847, when editor of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle,
he published thirteen articles on musical subjects. His
first critical opera review was of Rossini's TheBarber
of Seville in March 1847. His most extended prose piece
onopera and the pleasures of opera-going is "Letter from
Paumanok," published on 14 August 1851, in the New York
Evening Post. Another relatively long essay, "The
Opera," appeared in Life Illustrated in November 1855,
just four months after the publication of Leaves of
Grass. In later years he included reminiscences of his
opera-going days in Specimen Days and in an essay, "The
Old Bowery," collected in the prose section of Good-Bye
My Fancy.
Bibliography
Cooke, Alice L. "Notes on Whitman's Musical Background."
New England Quarterly 19 (1946): 224-235.
Faner, Robert D. Walt Whitman & Opera. 1951. London:
Feffer and Simons, 1972.
Lawrence, Vera Brodsky. "'Unloos'd Cantabile': Walt
Whitman and the Italian Opera." Seaport 26.1 (1992):
38-45.
Pound, Louise. "Walt Whitman and Italian Music."
AmericanMercury 6 (1925): 58-63.
Spiegelman, Julia. "Walt Whitman and Music."
SouthAtlantic Quarterly 41(1942): 167-176.
Traubel, Horace. With Walt Whitman in Camden. Vol. 2.
New York: Appleton, 1908.
Trowbridge, John Townsend. "Reminiscences of Walt
Whitman." Atlantic Monthly 89 (1902): 163-175.
Whitman, Walt. Prose Works 1892. Ed. Floyd Stovall. 2
vols. New York: New York UP, 1963-1964.
____. The Uncollected Poetry and Prose of Walt Whitman.
Ed. Emory Holloway. 2 vols. Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, Page, 1921.
Where Are We Now?: Whitman, Place and the Memory of the
Heart
Rosemary McAndrew Rutgers University-Camden
“…the little thrill which memory will send along my
nerves…”
--Walt Whitman, November Boughs
Reading Whitman is to engage in his metamorphoses,
reflect on his memories, and create our own “patterns of
attachment.” It is no small contradiction that Whitman
establishes a robust sense of place, while he pulls us,
his traveling companions, to other sites with his
reflections. We have taken “solitary rambles” with this
writer, only to discover ourselves taken to another
country, another life. We are rewarded for our diligence
as readers, with scenes painted in panoramic color and
experiences dipped in the cool waters of familiarity.
When Whitman remembers, his sense of place is at once
democratic and self-centered. When we read Whitman, we
are at once reflective of other universal experiences
and “in the moment” with the poet in his place.
In J. Gerald Kennedy’s Imaging Paris: Exile Writing and
American Identity, the experience of place is described
as an “elusive and perplexing phenomenon,” because
modern society works against it and yet, he claims,
there are clear “patterns of attachment” that form the
basis for the experience of place for individuals.
Lawrence Buell, in Writing for an Endangered World,
echoes this thought, claiming that place is so integral
to the human condition that it “shapes human
character.”
As Kennedy explains, patterns of
“geographical association … reveal the human tendency to
regard places as focuses of activity and purpose.”
Whitman draws on his memories of place to show the
reader the “ties that bind,” those elusive, fleeting,
but nonetheless startling recognitions of place that
inform us. For Whitman, these deep associations are
recollections that have shaped his life, each place an
episode particularly moving and persistent.
In the summer of 1880, Whitman left
Philadelphia and journeyed to London, Ontario, where he
would make his temporary home with Dr. Richard Maurice
Bucke, a Canadian psychiatrist, social reformer, and
mystic, and his wife, Jessie. His time in Canada would
include a trip down the St. Lawrence to the Thousand
Islands, Montreal and Quebec, then up the Saguenay to
Chicoutini and Ha!Ha! Bay. He also visited and commented
on the Asylum for the Insane where Bucke was the
Superintendent. Dr. Bucke later became Whitman’s first
biographer, edited an edition of Leaves of Grass, and
acted as Whitman’s literary executor.
On June 20th of that summer, while in
Ontario, Walt Whitman read a New York Times account of
the demise of a church in Brooklyn. St. Ann’s Church,
although 1,000 miles from Whitman on that day, was near
to his heart, as he recalled a memory from his
childhood. Fifty years before, he had attended services,
at Sands and Washington Streets, for the men killed in
the Brooklyn Navy Yard explosion. Whitman was at his
elementary school that day and heard the rumble which
“jarred half the city,” when the U. S. steamer Fulton
exploded. The “strange and solemn military funeral”
started from St. Ann’s with what Whitman remembered as
“impressive services...dead march of the band…old
soldiers and salutes over the grave, in the ancient
cemetery.” The child Whitman was moved to tears. In the
summer of 1880, although in Canada, memory placed
Whitman in the New York of his boyhood.
Later that month, the New York Times carried another
piece. This one, entitled “Walt Whitman at Niagara,”
chronicles “some lucky five minutes” at the falls, and
becomes the entry “Seeing Niagara to Advantage” in
Specimen Days. In this piece, Whitman takes in the scene
of the falls, not up close, but purposefully “a mile
off.” The reader sees with him the vista that includes
“the river tumbling green and white…dark high
banks…plentiful umbrage…bronze cedars, in shadow…and
tempering and arching all the immense materiality, a
clear sky overhead.” [T]his “short, indescribable show”
unfolds for Whitman from a train platform, as it crosses
a bridge. As this experience “lay[s] away with [his]
life’s rare and blessed bits of hours,” we find we have
traveled with him back in time to Fire Island and a
“wild sea-storm” Whitman witnessed “one winter day.”
With this, the first of the remembrances of place in
this piece, he begins to catalog for us the special
place that the view of Niagara will have for him
henceforth. The view, “[N]ot the great majestic gem
alone by itself, but set complete in all its varied,
full, indispensable surroundings,” will take its place
in a set of six other place memories brought on by his
encounter with it.
“Seeing Niagara to Advantage”
For really seizing a great picture or book, or piece of
music, or architecture, or grand scenery -- or perhaps
for the first time even the common sunshine, or
landscape, or may be even the mystery of identity, most
curious mystery of all -- there comes some lucky five
minutes of a man's life, set amid a fortuitous
concurrence of circumstances, and bringing in a brief
flash the culmination of years of reading and travel and
thought. The present case about two o'clock this
afternoon, gave me Niagara, its superb severity of
action and color and majestic grouping, in one short,
indescribable show. We were very slowly crossing the
Suspension bridge -- not a full stop anywhere, but next
to it -- the day clear, sunny, still -- and I out on the
platform. The falls were in plain view about a mile off,
but very distinct, and no roar -- hardly a murmur. The
river tumbling green and white, far below me; the dark
high banks, the plentiful umbrage, many bronze cedars,
in shadow; and tempering and arching all the immense
materiality, a clear sky overhead, with a few white
clouds, limpid, spiritual, silent. Brief, and as quiet
as brief, that picture -- a remembrance always
afterwards. Such are the things, indeed, I lay away with
my life's rare and blessed bits of hours, reminiscent,
past -- the wild sea-storm I once saw one winter day,
off Fire island -- the elder Booth in Richard, that
famous night forty years ago in the old Bowery -- or
Alboni in the children's scene in Norma -- or
night-views, I remember, on the field, after battles in
Virginia -- or the peculiar sentiment of moonlight and
stars over the great Plains, western Kansas -- or
scooting up New York bay, with a stiff breeze and a good
yacht, off Navesink. With these, I say, I henceforth
place that view, that afternoon, that combination
complete, that five minutes' perfect absorption of
Niagara -- not the great majestic gem alone by itself,
but set complete in all its varied, full, indispensable
surroundings.
When Whitman refers to the winter sea storm off Fire
Island, we are reminded of a poem in Leaves of Grass. In
“From Montauk Point,” Whitman stands again from some
vantage point that allows a special view:
I stand as on some mighty eagle’s beak,
Eastward the sea absorbing, viewing, (nothing but sea
and sky,)
The tossing waves, the foam, the ships in the distance,
The wild unrest, the snowy, curling caps -- that inbound
urge
and urge of waves,
Seeking the shores forever.
The geography is not quite right, of course, Fire Island
being somewhat south of Montauk Point, but the poem
gives the reader a time to see a similar event through
Whitman’s eyes and acquire another clue about how events
are stored away in memory.
The theatrical world of the Old Bowery is
our next stop in his sequence of place memories. In
December 1832, at a performance of Richard III, starring
British actor Junius Brutus Booth, the line between
audience and actor blurred as it would do on occasion in
the nineteenth century. The New York Mirror reported
that a holiday crowd of over three hundred overflowed
the stage and entered into the spirit of the play.
According to Lawrence Levine, in Highbrow Lowbrow: The
Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America, the audience
governed the stage as they made a dance in this
performance repeat twenty times and, in another scene, a
few helped themselves to items from a supper-table.
Perhaps this is why, when Whitman saw the elder Booth
perform a few years later at the Old Bowery theatre, he
wrote, “He illustrated Plato’s rule that to the forming
an artist of the very highest rank, a dash of insanity
or what the world calls insanity is indispensable.” In
any case, there is no doubt that Whitman relegates Mr.
Booth and the Old Bowery to the place where memories of
the heart live. In November Boughs, another prose piece
by Whitman, he says “To me, too, Booth stands for much
else besides theatricals. I consider that my seeing the
man those years glimps'd for me, beyond all else, that
inner spirit and form -- the unquestionable.” When
Whitman recalls “the elder Booth in Richard, that famous
night forty years ago in the old Bowery” in this section
of Specimen Days, the memory of place is rich with
“patterns of attachment.”
Another memory is of opera, an art that
Whitman proclaimed the “sublimest and most spiritual of
the arts.” When he refers to “Alboni in the children’s
scene in Norma,” he is referring to Marietta Alboni, the
Italian operatic contralto known for her classic Italian
bel canto. In the final year of his life, Whitman,
commenting on his youthful days from 1835-1860, wrote
that he “should like well” if the contralto Marietta
Alboni or the tenor Alessandro Bettini, or “the old
composer” Giuseppe Verdi “could know how much noble
pleasure and happiness they gave me, and how deeply I
always remember them….” In Leaves of Grass his tribute
to Alboni is in a section called “Proud Music of the
Storm”:
(The teeming lady comes,
The lustrious orb, Venus contralto, the blooming mother,
Sister of loftiest gods, Alboni's self I hear.)
Kennedy makes a distinction between the “psychic or
emotion conditions” of place and the “mental images” of
place. For Whitman, the place of opera is emotional, as
he assigns Booth and Alboni to “life’s rare and blessed
bits of hours.” It is, as Kennedy reminds us, “less the
retrieval of a bygone time than a recovery of symbolic
place” that Whitman undertakes here.
When next Whitman remembers from his Niagara
perch, it is the “night-views,” “on the field, after
battles in Virginia,” a scene that reminds us of the
power nature has to transform disaster into hope with
its beauty. In the section on Virginia, in Specimen
Days, Whitman tells of how “The nights are often
unsurpassable. Last evening (Feb. 8,) I saw the first of
the new moon, the outlined old moon clear along with it;
the sky and air so clear, such transparent hues of
color, it seem'd to me I had never really seen the new
moon before. It was the thinnest cut crescent possible.
It hung delicate just above the sulky shadow of the Blue
mountains. Ah, if it might prove an omen and good
prophecy for this unhappy State.” Virginia may be
“[D]ilapidated, fenceless, and trodden with war,” but
Whitman sees the natural beauty of the landscape as a
symbol of its potential for healing.
That same reverence for nature is available
to us in Whitman’s next memory of the “great Plains,
western Kansas.” In “New Senses, New Joys,” he uses
place in the way Edward Relph describes it, as that
“projection of human sensibility upon the natural or
built environment”:
Talk as you like, a typical Rocky Mountain
canyon, or a limitless sea-like stretch of the
great Kansas or Colorado plains, under favoring
circumstances, tallies, perhaps expresses,
certainly awakes, those grandest and subtlest
element emotions in the human soul…
Here, although grounded in a place, we are transported
to a transforming experience of a spiritual nature, or
“maybe even the mystery of identity.” Whitman claims
that Specimen Days is meant to “illustrate one phase of
humanity,” and his references, to specific memories in
the Niagara section sometimes look like what Hemingway
called “accidents of terrain;” however, place memories
run deep and, in Whitman, we can see these specific
memories repeated in his poetry and prose.
The last memory of Whitman’s Niagara piece has us
“scooting up New York bay, with a stiff breeze and a
good yacht, off Navesink.” Navesink, a seaside
elevation, on the New Jersey coast, at the lower
entrance of New York Bay, is the topic of one of the
poems in the “Sands at Seventy” book of Leaves of Grass.
The first of eight poems in the “Fancies at Navesink”
section begins with “an old St. Lawrence reminiscence.”
The reader has traveled from New York Bay to the St.
Lawrence and back; memories of “steaming the northern
rapids” come to Whitman in New York Bay, while the
Navesink memory comes alive in Niagara. Whitman calls it
“a sudden memory-flash,” but later in the poems he
describes how memory is as unrelenting as the waves, “in
every crest some undulating light or shade—some
retrospect.”
With Whitman, we appreciate the immense and
expanding civilization of his vision, while we are
drenched in a specific place. Sometimes it is the
physical place in which he stands; other times, it is a
memory of place to which he takes us. Yi-Fu Tuan makes
the distinction between “space,” which defines distance
and allows movement, and “place,” which is experienced
and remembered. As we move among Whitman’s works, we can
see the emotion and memory that makes place possible. We
can also feel the commitment and attachment that are
integral to place. Place lives in Whitman’s heart, until
he gives it the language of memory.
"I Hear America Singing"
Whitman and the Music of his Time
by David S. Reynolds
Recalling the entertainment experiences of his young
manhood, Whitman wrote, "Perhaps my dearest amusement
reminiscences are those musical ones." Music was such a
powerful force on him that he saw himself less as a poet
than as a singer or bard. "My younger life," he recalled
in old age, "was so saturated with the emotions,
raptures, up- lifts of such musical experiences that it
would be surprising indeed if all my future work had not
been colored by them."
Whitman regarded music as a prime agent for unity and
uplift in a nation whose tendencies to fragmentation and
political corruption he saw clearly. For all the
downward tendencies he perceived in society, he took
confidence in Americans' shared love of music. In the
1855 preface to Leaves of Grass he mentioned
specifically "their delight in music, the sure symptoms
of manly tenderness and native elegance of soul." As he
explained in a magazine article: "A taste for music,
when widely distributed among a people, is one of the
surest indications of their moral purity, amiability,
and refinement. It promotes sociality, represses the
grosser manifestations of the passions, and substitutes
in their place all that is beautiful and artistic." By
becoming himself a "bard" singing poetic "songs" he
hoped to tap the potential for aesthetic appreciation he
saw in Americans' positive responses to their shared
musical culture.
Whitman's immersion into his contemporary musical
culture followed distinct phases. An invasion of foreign
virtuosos in the early forties piqued his interest in
music but, at the same time, drove him to embrace the
simpler, more heart-felt indigenous music of the
American families and minstrel troupes. His appreciation
of these popular forms, in turn, opened the way to
Italian opera, which in the fifties actually came close
to being a popular art.
He was then writing for the strongly nationalistic
Democratic Review, and his nativist politics seemed to
have prevented him from fully embracing the foreign
musical masters. What he sought was music that sprang
from indigenous soil and embodied the idioms and
concerns of average Americans.
He discovered such music in the family singers and
minstrel troupes that became immensely popular in the
mid-forties. In a series of newspaper articles written
from 1845 to 1847 he rejoiced over what he saw as the
distinctly American qualities of the new family groups.
The Cheneys, a quartet of three brothers and a sister
from New Hampshire, thrilled him when he first heard
them in November 1845 at Niblo's Theatre. In an article
for the Brooklyn Star he raved: "For the first time we,
on Monday night, heard something in the way of American
music, which overpowered us with delightful amazement."
He declared that they "excel all the much vaunted
foreign artists, not excepting Templeton, whom we saw
there." He revised and expanded the article four times
to include other singing families, particularly the
famous Hutchinsons. In all its versions, the message was
the same: what he termed the "art music" of the foreign
musicians was overly elaborate and fundamentally
aristocratic, while the "heart music" of the American
families was natural and democratic. As he wrote:
"Simple, fresh, and beautiful, we hope no spirit of
imitation will ever induce them to engraft any 'foreign
airs' upon their 'native graces.' "
It is worthwhile to look especially at his favorite
singing family, the Hutchinsons, whom he singled out for
praise in his articles on music. The most popular family
group before the Civil War, the Hutchinson singers
consisted of three brothers--Judson, John, Asa--and
their younger sister Abby, part of a talented family of
thirteen boys and girls from New Hampshire. Naturally
gifted vocalists who accompanied themselves with string
instruments, they gave their first public concert in
1839, and, with additions and substitutions of different
family members, they remained popular for nearly four
decades. They became international celebrities and
played to packed houses everywhere. They were invited to
perform at the White House by President Tyler, and their
circle of friends included Frederick Douglass, Edwin
Forrest, Longfellow, and, eventually, Lincoln. Their
catchy songs ran the gamut of popular idioms, from the
sentimental to the sensational, and promoted a variety
of reforms, particularly temperance and antislavery.
Whitman found in the Hutchinsons a winning artlessness.
"Elegant simplicity in manner," he wrote of them, "is
more judicious than the dancing school bows and
curtsies, and inane smiles, and kissing of the tips of a
kid glove a la [Rosina] Pico."Like them, in his poetry
he would strive for naturalness and what he called "a
perfectly transparent, plate-glassy style, artless,"
characterized by "clearness, simplicity, no twistified
or foggy sentences."
He also valued the fact that the Hutchinsons sang about
common American experience and the ordinary lives of
average individuals. In the Eagle he noted that they
"are true sons of the Old Granite State [New Hampshire];
they are democrats." Their signature song, "The Old
Granite State," gave all thirteen siblings' names along
with their convictions and political views. The premiere
song of Whitman's favorite group, then, made singing
oneself and "singing America" commonplace in the public
arena. Whitman, comparably, wove autobiographical
details into his poems: "Walt Whitman, an American, one
of the roughs, a kosmos."
The Hutchinsons also developed the stylistic device of
solo and group singing-- male and female solos by each
of the four singers, for the verses, were interspersed
with choral refrains. Judson, a high second tenor, often
took the melody line. John, a versatile baritone, glided
easily into a falsetto, while Abby sang a rich contralto
and Asa a resonant bass. Whitman was powerfully stirred
by the rich vocal mixtures the singing families
introduced, capturing them in his poem "That Music
Always Round Me":
[N]ow the chorus I hear and am elated,
A tenor, strong, ascending with power and health, with
glad notes of daybreak I hear,
A soprano at intervals sailing buoyantly over the tops
of immense waves,
A transparent base shuddering lusciously under and
through the universe, [...]
I hear not the volumes of sound merely, I am moved by
the exquisite meanings,
I listen to the different voices winding in and out,
striving, contending with fiery vehemence to excel each
other in emotion[.]
Another form of American music that appealed to Whitman
was the minstrel song. Minstrel troupes were generally
white performers in blackface who gave caricatured
versions of African American customs and dialects. For
decades America was inundated by touring groups with
names like the Sable Minstrels and the Virginia
Harmonists.
Whitman took avid interest in the minstrel troupes that
proliferated in the mid- forties. In an 1846 article,
"True American Singing," he praised a minstrel group
called the Harmoneons: "Indeed, their negro singing
altogether proves how shiningly golden talent can be
spread over a subject generally considered 'low.'
Singing with them is a subject from obscure life in the
hands of a divine painter: rags, patches, and coarseness
are imbued with the great genius of the artist, and
there exists something really great about them."
Particularly intriguing is the possible relationship
between Whitman and the leading minstrel songwriter,
Stephen Foster. Whitman once commented that songs like
Foster's "Old Folks at Home" were "our best work so far"
in native music. The first American to earn a living
from songwriting, Foster first gained wide popular
success in 1847 with "Oh! Susanna," followed in the next
five years with "My Old Kentucky Home," "Beautiful
Dreamer," "Old Dog Tray," and many others.
Foster broke with the almost uniformly racist tone of
previous minstrel fare, portraying African Americans as
capable of sorrow, fear, hope, pain, and nostalgia. This
gesture toward the humanization of blacks is also
visible in Whitman's verse, when he wrote in "I Sing the
Body Electric" of the "passions, desires, reachings,
aspirations" of the auctioned slave.
With the rise of Foster, American music became popular
and participatory to an unprecedented degree. In the
days before such passive entertainments as radio and
television, musical culture was shared in ways that are
sometimes forgotten. People would hear melodies and sing
them constantly aloud to themselves, creating, as it
were, their own musical programs. Whitman himself did
this. Often when alone he sang popular ballads or
martial songs in a low undertone, and while sauntering
he hummed snatches of popular songs or operas. In this
sense he was little different than most of his
contemporaries. Foster's music sprang naturally from
American's lips in the early 1850s. The song Whitman
especially liked, "Old Folks at Home" (with the famous
lyrics, "Way down upon the Swanee River"), became the
national favorite of 1852, sung by virtually everyone.
There was historical justification, then, for Whitman's
confidence that music was commonly loved and even
performed by many Americans. "I hear America singing,
the varied carols I hear,/Those of mechanics, each one
singing his as it should be blithe and strong"--and so
forth, as he goes on to describe the singing of the
mason, the boatman, the shoemaker, the wood-cutter, the
wife, all "singing with open mouths their strong
melodious songs."
The popularity of the singing families opened the door
to an appreciation for the opera. Unlike today, when
most popular music is rooted in soul, jazz, or country
forms, the music of the family singers was closely
linked to the opera. By the same token, most "elite"
musicians gave adventurously varied programs.
Nothing revealed the mixture of elite and popular
cultural levels as vividly as the American tour of the
Swedish singer Jenny Lind in the early 1850s. The
"Swedish Nightingale" was a dexterous, classically
trained vocalist who gave a varied program that
juxtaposed high arias with a grab bag of popular
ballads, comic songs, folk tunes, and patriotic numbers.
Her two-year tour of America that started in New York in
1850 in was a combination of craftsmanship and hype
unequalled in American musical history, orchestrated by
the master showman P. T. Barnum. The darling of the
public, Jenny Lind did not fare as well with reviewers,
among them Whitman, who caught her last New York
concert. "The Swedish Swan," he wrote, "with all her
blandishments, never touched my heart in the least."
Although he conceded she had "vocal dexterity," he found
her "scientific" style a frigid failure.
What Whitman wanted was music that was at once
sophisticated and soulful, that had both "art" and
"heart." He found such music in the great opera singers
who came to America in the early fifties. New York was
graced by a succession of touring opera stars. Whitman
enjoyed the musical quickening. Once averse to the
opera, in 1847 he declared in the Eagle that "the
Italian opera deserves a good degree of encouragement
from us." He heard at least sixteen of the major singers
who made their New York debuts in the next eight years.
Among the male singers, the ones he most admired were
the Italian baritone Cesare Badiali and the tenor
Alessandro Bettini. The large, broad-chested Badiali,
who first appeared in New York in 1850, Whitman called
"the superbest of all the superb baritones in my time."
Bettini made it clear to him that art music need not be
distinct from heart music. "The fresh, vigorous tones of
Bettini!" Whitman wrote in 1851. "His voice has often
affected me to tears. Its clear, firm, wonderfully
exalting notes....[T]he singing of this man has
breathing blood within it; the living soul, of which the
lower stage they call art, is but the shell and sham."
It was almost certainly Bettini to whom he paid tribute
in this passage in "Song of Myself": "A tenor large and
fresh as the creation fills me,/The orbic flex of his
mouth is pouring and filling me full." Another tenor he
heard in the early fifties, Pasquale Bignole, remained
so vivid a memory that upon Bignole's death in 1884 he
wrote a eulogistic poem, "The Dead Tenor," reviewing by
name his major operatic roles and recreating the effect
of his singing:
How much from thee! the revelation of the singing voice
from thee!
(So firm--so liquid-soft--again that tremulous, manly
timbre!
The perfect singing voice--deepest of all to me the
lesson:--trial and test of all) [...]
Fernando's heart, Manrico's passionate call, Ernani's,
sweet Gennaro's,
I fold thenceforth, or seek to fold, within my chants
transmuting.
Among all the opera stars, the one that shone brightest
for him was Marietta Alboni, the great contralto who
also sang soprano roles. "For me," he said, "out of the
whole list of stage deities of that period, no one meant
so much to me as Alboni." A short, plump woman with a
low forehead and black hair, Alboni , after several
European tours, arrived in New York in the summer of
1852. Her opening on a sweltering June 23 at
Metropolitan Hall was a complete triumph. She had sung
only two lines when shouts of "bravo, bravo" swelled
from the audience as her strong, sumptuous tones filled
the air. At the end, she laughed giddily at the long,
tumultuous cheering and waving of hats and
handkerchiefs. "There was never a more successful
concert," raved the next day's Herald. "[Her voice has]
the finest, softest, and richest texture, depth and
great purity, with a most remarkable sympathetic
touching quality." In the months that followed the
triumph continued. Between that summer and the next
spring in Manhattan she appeared in ten operas and gave
twelve concerts of operatic selections. She also toured
other cities and states. Whitman later wrote that he
heard her "every time she sang in New York and
vicinity." "She used to sweep me away as with
whirlwinds," he said.
It was not Alboni's talent alone that stood out. What
made her special were her combined artistry,
soulfulness, and egalitarianism. A consummate artist,
she was nonetheless down-to-earth and thoroughly human
in her delivery. Whitman never forgot the way she got so
caught up in her roles that real tears poured down her
cheeks.
The rapture Alboni inspired in him had more direct
poetic consequences as well. "I hear the trained soprano
(what work with hers is this?)," he writes in "Song of
Myself." "The orchestra whirls me wider than Uranus
flies,/It wrenches such ardors from me I did not know I
possess'd them." Although he included in his poems the
names of several operas, opera characters, and classical
composers, he named just one singer: "(The teeming lady
comes,/The lustrous orb, Venus contralto, the blooming
mother,/Sister of the loftiest gods, Alboni's self I
hear.)"
He was intrigued by Alboni's appeal to all classes. He
had long sought a music that was at once sophisticated
and populist, and he found it at last in Alboni. "All
persons appreciated Alboni," he noted, "the common crowd
as well as the connoisseurs." He was fascinated to see
the upper tier of theaters "packed full of New York
young men, mechanics, 'roughs,' etc., entirely oblivious
of all except Alboni."
Opera was now his chosen preference in music, and he did
what he could to enhance its appeal for the general
public. In his article "The Opera" published in 1855 in
Life Illustrated he tried to instill in the
unsophisticated a love for opera. He warned the
uninitiated that the opera was "very far different from
what you were used to--the church choir, or the songs
and playing on the piano...or any performances of the
Ethiopian minstrels, or the concerts of the different
'families.'" Then, finally, he got to the music itself:
"A new world--a liquid world--rushes like a torrent
through you. " He ended the piece by calling for an
American music that might rival Europe's: "This is art!
You envy Italy, and almost become an enthusiast; you
wish an equal art here, and an equal science and style,
underlain by a perfect understanding of American
realities, and the appropriateness of our national
spirit and body also."
In light of the new musical vistas opened up by the
opera, he knew he would have to forge a new kind of
singing, one that highlighted American themes but also
integrated operatic techniques. "Walt Whitman's method
in the construction of his songs is strictly the method
of the Italian Opera," he would write in 1860, and to a
friend he confided, "But for the opera I could not have
written Leaves of Grass." Opera devices indeed run
through his poetry. Many of the emotionally expressive,
melodic passages, such as the bird's song in "Out of the
Cradle Endlessly Rocking" or the death hymn in "When
Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd," evoke the style of
the aria. The more expansive, conversational passages in
his poetry suggest operatic recitative.
Whitman's poetry, then, was most profoundly influenced
by what he called "the great, overwhelming, touching
human voice—its throbbing, flowing, pulsating
qualities." Of the 206 musical words in his poems, 123
relate specifically to vocal music, and some are used
many times. "Song" appears 154 times, "sing" 117, and
"singing" an "singers" over 30 times each.	In his
poems, too, he mentions no fewer than 25 musical
instruments, including the violin, the piano, the oboe,
and the drums. One senses a musical influence in his
poem "Song of Myself," which, like a symphony, shifts
between pianissimo passages and torrential, fervent
ones. Perhaps particularly apt to compare with Whitman
is Anthony Phillip Heinrich, one of America's leading
classical composers before the Civil War. Rebelling
against the symmetries of Mozart and Haydn, Heinrich,
known as "the log-house composer of Kentucky," imported
into his music indigenous American idioms and a rambling
form linked stylistically to frontier humor and the tall
tale. His joyous, egalitarian brand of music mixed the
classical with the vernacular, as Whitman did in his
poems. In the early fifties, Heinrich wrote an
intriguing composition, Barbecue Divertimento,
containing a section called "The Banjo," a free-form
extravaganza that juxtaposes staid European-based
passages with snatches from "Turkey in the Straw" and
"Yankee Doodle." That Whitman envisaged strikingly
similar mixtures of "high" European music and vernacular
American music is shown in this note: "American
opera.--put three banjos, (or more?) in the
orchestra--and let them accompany (at times
exclusively,) the songs of the baritone or tenor--." In
this regard, both Heinrich and Whitman were precursors
of Charles Ives.
by David S. Reynolds
1999
Una
epigrafe per Marietta Alboni al Teatro “Bonci” di Cesena
Lelio
Burgini, mi invita a ricordare il tributo ideale che
Walt Whitman, il maggiore poeta americano volle dedicare
alla voce di Marietta Alboni ( 1826-1894 ) che si
considerava cittadina cesenate per le origini familiari,
anche se nata a Città di Castello, e alla quale gli
amici del Coro Alboni, presieduto da Bruno Benvenuti,
hanno fatto dedicare la Piazzetta antistante alla
Barriera. Sarebbe opportuno che questa epigrafe, in
lingua originale, fosse affissa a quella che fu la sua
casa d’angolo di Via Mura della Barriera Ponente, o
almeno al Bonci, nostro tempio musicale. Ne trascrivo il
testo. La versione italiana di Enzo Giachino è dalle
edizioni Einaudi di Foglie d’erba. E’ inserita alla pag.
16, nelle Dediche. Erano le Inscriptions, iscrizioni
sulla pietra o sulle monete.
LEAVES
OF GRASS.
To a Certain Cantatrice/
Here, take this gift,/
I was reserving it for some hero, speaker, or general,/
One who should serve the good old cause, the great idea,
the progress and freedom of the race,/
Some brave confronter of despots, some daring rebel;/
But I see that what I was reserving belongs to you/
just
as much as to any./
(Traduzione)
FOGLIE D'ERBA
A una
cantante /
Eccoti
questo dono,/
Io lo
serbavo per qualche eroe, oratore o generale./
Per
qualcuno che avesse servito la buona vecchia causa,/
la grande
idea, il progresso e la libertà della razza,/
Per
qualche eroe che avesse affrontato despoti,/
per
qualche audace ribelle;/
Ma vedo
che quanto serbavo a te appartiene non meno che/
a ciascuno
di essi./
Lelio
Burgini mi invia anche alcuni pezzi di critica musicale,
scaricati da Internet per documentare l’amore di Whitman
per l’opera italiana ed in particolare l’ammirazione per
la voce di Marietta Alboni, contralto rossiniano
insuperabile. Whitman l’aveva sentita, critico musicale
e giornalista, a New York nel 1852. Già nel suo commento
finale alla traduzione di Michele Massarelli del libro
di Arthur Pougin su Marietta Alboni, per le edizioni Il
Pontevecchio di Cesena, 2001, Lelio Burgini ne aveva
evocato i rapporti con Cesena ( “Cesena ha più dolci
ricordi”, pagg. 117-121 ).Ma il problema dei rapporti
Whitman-Alboni e musica europea è molto più complesso.
Non basterebbe un volume a chiarirlo. Whitman ha
inserito la sua vita nella sua opera. Le Foglie d’erba
apparvero nel 1855, quando aveva trentasei anni. Erano
versi liberi per un poeta libero, che si faceva ritrarre
in maniche di camicia e il cappello alle ventitré, una
sfida in ogni senso alla tradizione “feudale” di ogni
cultura precedente, specie l’ europea. Era un inno a se
stesso mentre cantava la marcia democratica dell’America
che si liberava dalla schiavitù. La marcia di
liberazione di se stesso equivaleva alla marcia di
liberazione del suo popolo. L’edizione di Foglie d’erba
del 1889, l’anno della sua morte, comprende quattrocento
poesie, un involucro di esperienze che si aggiunsero
alle prime dodici del 1855.Betsy Eikkila, che i lettori
possono trovare anche in Internet, sostiene che nel
“Canto di me stesso”, Sing of Myself, confluiscono e si
bilanciano tutte le contraddizioni di un’epoca: “Whitman
tesse un modello globale di unità nella diversità.
Questo modello di molti e uno - il “e pluribus unum” che
fu il sigillo rivoluzionario della Repubblica americana
– è l’architrave di Foglie d’Erba. Io presento “Canto di
Me stesso” come un dramma dell’identità democratica in
cui il poeta cerca di bilanciare e riconciliare i
maggiori conflitti nel corpo politico dell’America. Il
conflitto tra “la persona separata” e “nella massa”,
individualismo ed eguaglianza, libertà e unione, il Sud
e il Nord, la fattoria e la città, il lavoro e il
capitale, il bianco e il nero, la femmina e il maschio,
la religione e la scienza. Ognuno può discutere una
delle sezioni individuali del poema in relazione a
questo conflitto”. Non mi risulta che la critica
nostrana si sia posta da questo punto di vista. Una
conclusione è in Democratic Vistas, Prospettive
democratiche, un suo saggio del 1871. Whitman lotta con
le tensioni centrali e i paradossi dell’esperienza
americana del Nuovo Mondo. Questi conflitti gli appaiono
più urgenti anche dopo il periodo della Guerra Civile
quando la forza scatenata del mercato capitalistico e la
dinamica della civilizzazione moderna appaiono girare
fuori controllo. “Chi imbriglia il Potere? Il
Leviathan?” . E’ la domanda che conclude lo studio del
Whitman e apre il nostro sul ” Modern World”, sul nuovo
mondo. Per questo Whitman resta il “bardo della
democrazia americana”, il cantore della “razza delle
razze” nel senso più ampio del termine. In questa
prospettiva democratica va interpretato il suo rapporto
con l’opera europea e la dedica all’Alboni come ad
un’eroina, impareggiabile interprete della Cenerentola
di Rossini.La “Cinderella” per il Whitman americano era
il sogno di riscatto da ogni servitù, di individuo e di
popolo.
Pietro
Castagnoli
"Giganti"
di
Roberto Mercadini
Ammetto che non ne sapevo niente, fino a poco
tempo fa. Sono venuto a conoscenza della cosa in maniera un po’ contorta
(come al solito). è andata
così. Giordano Conti ha scritto un libro. Si intitola La Romagna e
l’Altrove. È un'accurata, documentatissima galleria di personaggi
romagnoli che hanno compiuto grandi imprese in giro per il mondo. Dal
medioevo ad oggi. Sorprendente. Partecipo alla presentazione del volume con
la mansione di lettore. Scelgo due brani. Uno di questo è quello sull’Alboni
(che prima, confesso, non avevo neanche mai sentito nominare). Alla fine
della presentazione mi si avvicina un signore. Mai visto prima. È felice che
si sia parlato del grande contralto cesenate, mi dice di essere un suo
grande fan, e membro di un’associazione musicale a lei dedicata. Il suo
entusiasmo è incontenibile. Insiste per regalarmi un CD dove è incisa la
stessa canzone per 4 ore e mezza. La Paloma. In decine di versioni diverse.
E di chi è la prima registrazione della storia in assoluto? Di Marietta
Alboni! È lui a raccontarmi la storia di Whitman. Ignoro il suo nome. Ma lo
ringrazio.
Io amo i giganti.
A me, per
esempio, è sempre dispiaciuta la brutta fine che ha fatto Golia.
A voi no?
Rifletteteci.
Golia era
–riporto le parole delle Scritture- "un uomo d’armi fin dalla sua
giovinezza" (Samuele 17, 33). Possiamo immaginare, dunque, cosa sia stata la
sua vita: disciplina, abnegazione, fatica, duri addestramenti, pericoli. E
poi?
Ripercorriamo
l’episodio fatale. Ne vale la pena.
Nel tragico
giorno due eserciti sono schierati sulla piana del Terebinto: gli israeliti,
i filistei. Golia esce dalle file dei filistei. Propone, al posto della
battaglia, un singolo scontro fra campioni. Così uno solo morirà. Uno solo
darà la vittoria al suo popolo. E si eviterà il massacro. È coraggioso e
saggio, Golia. Ma dalle file degli israeliti si fa avanti "ein ish",
nessuno. In compenso fra di loro gironzola un bambino ("na’ar", in ebraico,
è un ragazzo dai 10 ai 15 anni. Quindi, per favore, dimenticate gli
omaccioni di Michelangelo e di Bernini). Si chiama Davide. E’ troppo piccolo
per combattere. Cosa ci fa lì, allora? Deve prendere la paga dei fratelli
più grandi e portarla al padre. È, come ogni bambino, curioso e petulante.
Ficca il naso nella cosa (assai più grande di lui). Vaneggia di affrontare
lui stesso il gigante. È una follia. Ma gli israeliti sono disperati. Alla
fine lo lasciano andare.
Davide non
possiede la minima cognizione in fatto di armi. Si fa avanti stringendo in
mano un bastone. Cosa che offende Golia profondamente. Poi il bambino, nella
sua insipienza, fa una scelta totalmente demenziale: carica una frombola
(arma usata per far piovere piogge di pietre sulle file nemiche lontane e
ancora serrate, ma del tutto inservibile in un duello faccia a faccia).
Ma la mano di Dio
guida il proiettile di Davide, così che si conficca dritto dritto nella
scatola cranica di Golia. Ed egli cade nella polvere. Morto. Umiliato da un
bambino. Con quale colpa, poi?
Be’, francamente
meritava di meglio.
Io amo i giganti.
Amo coloro che sono, in un modo qualsiasi, più grandi del normale, del
giusto, del conveniente; quelli che tracimano, che travalicano, che
trasbordano. Di solito la pagano cara, tutta questa grandezza.
I giganti, in
genere, non stanno a loro agio nella vita di tutti i giorni, con quelli
della misura giusta (e men che meno coi bambini, ovviamente). Però sono
molto felici fra loro. E, nonostante li dividano distante colossali, trovano
il modo d’incontrarsi, prima o poi. Di riconoscersi. Di esultare l’uno
dell’altro. In barba a Davide.
Per esempio?
Ecco la storia di
due giganti. Hanno colmato, pur di trovarsi, la distanza fra Cesena e
Broadway.
Il primo gigante
(gigantessa, per la precisione) è Marietta Alboni: una delle più grandi
cantanti liriche che la storia ricordi. Forse, in assoluto, il più grande
contralto d’ogni tempo. Marietta è sovradimensionata in tutto: nel talento
musicale, nell’istinto scenico, nella potenza vocale. E nel peso corporeo,
naturalmente. Ci sono arrivate, su tutto ciò, frasi impietose, comiche e
–per me- entusiasmanti. Lei stessa parla così di se stessa bambina: "ero
tanto larga quanto alta, un vero baule" e ancora "[A soli nove anni] la mia
voce aveva acquistato un tale sviluppo che, quando mi sentivano senza
vedermi, tutti avrebbero giurato di ascoltare una ragazza di diciassette
anni".
Il suo primo
maestro, tal Bagioli, si compiace di lei così: "non è affatto sgraziata
questa grossa palla: cammina, parla, gesticola sul palcoscenico come se in
tutta la vita non avesse fatto altro". Il contrasto fra la stazza e
l’incantevole delicatezza della voce spinge i commentatori ad ardite
metafore zoologiche: "è un elefante che s’è ingoiato un usignolo" scrive
Emiliana de Girardin. E quando interpreta la cenerentola di Rossini: "questa
robusta Cenerentola avrebbe schiacciato, se l’avesse voluto, le sue magre e
spregevoli sorelle" (Pougin).
A 26 anni, ormai
osannata in tutto il pianeta, compie una tournee negli Stati Uniti. A
Broadway, fra le miriadi di spettatori che la applaudono, c’è un tizio. Ha
33 anni; e non ha ancora combinato granché nella vita. Per ora sbarca il
lunario arrabattandosi fra vari mestieri: giornalista, tipografo, falegname,
muratore. Si chiama Walt Whitman. Scriverà una delle più magnifiche raccolte
poetiche di ogni letteratura: Foglie d’erba: 700 pagine di liriche –a volte-
interminabili, composte di versi –molto spesso- così lunghi da non stare in
un rigo solo. Un titano. Borges (che se ne intendeva) scrive di lui "Per un
certo tempo considerai Whitman non solo un grande poeta, ma l'unico
poeta. Infatti pensavo che tutti i poeti del mondo fino al 1855 [prima
edizione di Foglie d’erba] non avevano fatto che servire da introduzione a
lui". I giganti si cercano e si riconoscono, si diceva. L’ignoto
(provvisoriamente) gigante americano riconosce la celeberrima (ai tempi)
gigantessa cesenate. In Foglie d’erba parla di lei. Fa il suo nome
nella poesia Musica grandiosa della tempesta:
Arriva la signora
scrosciante
Il globo lucente,
la Venere contralto, la madre rigogliosa
Sorella dei più
alti dei, ascolto l’Alboni in persona.
Fu immensa musica. E’ immane poesia. In barba a Davide.